FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Online materials, documents

Pages:   || 2 |

«Mr Robert F. Steadman: Professional Conduct Panel outcome Panel decision and reasons on behalf of the Secretary of State for Education September 2013 ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Mr Robert F. Steadman:

Professional Conduct

Panel outcome

Panel decision and reasons on behalf of the

Secretary of State for Education

September 2013


A. Introduction 3

B. Allegations 4

C. Preliminary applications 4

D. Summary of evidence 5

Documents 5 Witnesses 5 E. Decision and reasons 6 Panel’s recommendation to the Secretary of State 12 Decision and reasons on behalf of the Secretary of State 13 Professional Conduct Panel decision and recommendations, and decision on behalf of the Secretary of State Teacher: Mr Robert Frederick Steadman Teacher ref no: 88/10468 Teacher date of birth: 01/04/1965 NCTL Case ref no: 9409 Date of Determination: 27 September 2013 Former employer: Lady Manners School, Shutts Lane, Bakewell, Derbyshire DE45 1JA.

A. Introduction A Professional Conduct Panel (“the Panel”) of the National College for Teaching (“the National College”) and Leadership convened on 25, 26 and 27 September 2013 at 53-55 Butts Road, Earlsdon Park, Coventry, CV1 3BH to consider the case of Robert Frederick Steadman.

The Panel members were Mr Brian Hawkins (Teacher Panellist - in the Chair), Mr Peter Cooper (Teacher Panellist) and Ms Jean Carter (Lay Panellist).

The Legal Adviser to the Panel was Mr Paddy Roche of Morgan Cole LLP Solicitors, Oxford.

The Presenting Officer for the National College was Ms Laura Ryan of Kingsley Napley LLP Solicitors, London.

Mr Robert Frederick Steadman was not present and was not represented.

The hearing took place in public and was recorded.

B. Allegations The Panel considered the allegations set out in the Notice of Proceedings dated 1 July 2013.

It was alleged that Mr Robert Frederick Steadman was guilty of Unacceptable Professional Conduct and/or Conduct that may bring the profession into disrepute, in that:Between January 2010 and May 2011 he engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Student, C, which included text messages, inappropriate physical contact and meetings outside of School.

2. Between 17 March 2011 and 21 March 2011 he allowed Student C to borrow his School laptop over the weekend and disclosed his laptop password to her.

3. During March 2011 inappropriate images were downloaded onto his School laptop via software that had not been authorised for use on the laptop and these images were subsequently viewed by Student C.

The Teacher did not admit the facts.

C. Preliminary applications In the absence of Mr Steadman the Presenting Officer made an Application for the case to proceed. The Panel decided to hear the case in the absence of Mr Steadman because he had effectively waived his right to be present. The Panel saw a written submission submitted by Mr Steadman and dated 23 September 2013 in which he said:I am very sorry that I am unable to attend this hearing”.

He went on to say:I do not want the case to be delayed any longer” and gave reasons asking that the case should proceed.

In addition Mr Steadman also sent an email to the National College confirming that he wanted the case to proceed.

The Presenting Officer also made an application to amend Particular 1 by substituting a commencement date of January 2010 for September 2007. The Panel decided that as the effect of this application was thus to reduce the time period covered by the Particular and prior notice of the application had been sent to Mr Steadman’s representative no prejudice would be caused to the absent teacher. The Panel therefore approved the requested amendment.

D. Summary of evidence Documents In advance of the hearing, the Panel received a bundle of documents which included:

–  –  –

The Panel members confirmed that they had read all of the documents in advance of the hearing.

Witnesses The Panel heard oral evidence from the following witnesses called by the Presenting Officer on behalf of the National College:Witness A, Head Teacher at Lady Manners School, Bakewell, Derbyshire.

2. Witness B, Deputy Head Teacher at Lady Manners School, Bakewell, Derbyshire.

3. Witness C, Assistant Director of Finance (Audit), Derbyshire County Council.

No other evidence was given on behalf of the National College.

Mr Steadman’s written statement pp 507 - 523 was read to the hearing by the Legal Advisor.

E. Decision and reasons The Panel announced its decision and reasons as follows:We have now carefully considered the case before us and have reached a decision.

We confirm that we have read all the documents provided in the bundle in advance of the hearing.

Summary of Case The case concerns allegations that while employed as a part time Teacher of Music at Lady Manners School, Bakewell, Robert Steadman formed a relationship with Student C who was a pupil at the School which involved contact by text messaging, lending Student C his School laptop, incidents of contact with Student C out of School and finally a meeting with Student C in Buxton where inappropriate physical contact occurred between the Teacher and pupil.

In the evidence contained in the case papers various specific messages passing between the Teacher and Student C are mentioned.

In relation to Particulars 2 and 3 of the Notice of Proceedings it is alleged that between 17 and 21 March 2011 Mr Steadman allowed Student C to borrow his School laptop and disclosed his laptop password to her so that she could access the material contained on it.

It is further alleged that inappropriate images which were pornographic had been downloaded onto the School laptop in contravention of the School’s IT Acceptable Use Policy and that the software installed had not been authorised and that these images were subsequently viewed by Student C.

Mr Steadman in his response denies the particulars of the allegation and asserts that he was simply trying to help Student C and that none of his conduct was inappropriate although he acknowledges that he did send some messages to Student C. He indicates that Student C has misrepresented the nature of the relationship that he had with the student. He is clear that there was no inappropriate touching at any time between the two of them. While he accepts that he did lend his School laptop to the Student he says he had no knowledge at all that there was any pornographic material or other inappropriate material contained on the laptop, that he was not responsible for downloading that material and was shocked to discover that such material had been found on the laptop. He says that the nature of his relationship with Student C was fully covered in an interview under caution with the Police who determined that no further action should be taken against him. He further asserts that the School and Local Authority’s investigation of the issues in this case was unfair and incompetent and that the investigation conclusions cannot be supported. He says the case papers are deficient in that no screen shots, prints or downloads are disclosed in the case papers and that the evidence of the Student C is in effect a “web of lies”. He says it was Student C who made advances to him which were rejected.

Findings of Fact

Our findings of fact are as follows:

We have found the following particulars of the allegation against Robert Steadman

proven, for these reasons:

1. Between January 2010 and May 2011 Robert Frederick Steadman engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Student, C, which included text messages, inappropriate physical contact and meetings outside of School.

We have carefully considered the accounts given by Student C the principal witness in this case which are contained in written summaries of two interviews held with Student C by the Head Teacher of Lady Manners School, Witness A.

Student C has not been called to give evidence in this hearing even though she is now over 20. We were told that she has declined to be involved further. There is no statement from her in the case papers. We are also concerned that the interview summaries have not been signed or dated and we have no evidence that she has checked their accuracy or approved the records in any way. We also learned that she made a statement to the Police who investigated this matter but we do not have a copy of that statement.

Finally Witness C told the hearing that she interviewed Student C in the course of the Local Authority’s investigation and although a record of that interview exists we have not seen a copy of it – it is not included in the case papers.

The only evidence from Student C is therefore hearsay and we have determined that the deficiencies in the interview records and the absence of other statements/accounts given by Student C require that we should treat her evidence with caution.

However we have concluded that we can rely upon it to the extent that we are satisfied that text messages were exchanged between Mr Steadman and Student C over a significant period of time and that a meeting took place in Mr Steadman’s car on 14 May 2011.

Those conclusions are supported by admissions that Mr Steadman himself made in his Investigation Meeting interview with Witness A on 20 July 2011. In that interview which was sent to Mr Steadman and, subject to some comments, approved by him he agreed that he had sent text messages and Emails to Student C. He said that the majority had been about arranging lifts and baby sitting. She was also having problems with her mother and she texted him about it. He said he thought he was being a supportive teacher. He continued – “It was a silly thing to do but at the time I thought it was the right thing to do”.

He mentioned an exchange when Student C was having an interview in London and she sent messages to say she was lonely and nervous. He said he replied with things like “be confident”. As she was bored she suggested playing eye spy or truth or dare. He commented “With hindsight I knew she shouldn’t have had my number but I was trying to calm her down”. He accepted there had possibly been a message about a dress she’d bought and how he had asked her to show it to him sometime which was “a follow on from other messages” and “sounds pervy out of context”.

He talked about Student C saying that she loved him and that his response was that “nothing can happen, I’m your teacher. We’re friends”.

We conclude on Mr Steadman’s own account of these exchanges that they form the basis of a relationship between teacher and pupil that was entirely inappropriate. In his written statement to this hearing Mr Steadman focuses on perceived differences in Student C’s various accounts of what transpired but does not acknowledge that the texts which he admits passed between himself and Student C were of themselves inappropriate because of the boundaries that should properly be observed in such a formal relationship.

This despite the fact that we heard from Witness A that Mr Steadman had attended Safeguarding and Child Protection Training delivered by the Headteacher on 12 February

2010. That training had included guidance on the duty of care to be exercised by teachers in dealings with pupils and the importance of demonstrating integrity, maturity and good judgement.

Specifically attendees were advised to keep all communications within clear professional boundaries not to give out personal contact details, only to make contact with children for professional reasons and that text messaging was rarely appropriate. Judged against those clear criteria we conclude that on his own account of the text messages they were plainly inappropriate.

Turning to the meeting on Saturday 14 May 2011 Mr Steadman says in his interview that Student C had been babysitting for him on the previous Tuesday evening. He arrived home and she “flirted and remained in a way he found uncomfortable. She put the kids to bed. I found her behaviour peculiar.” He describes later a series of messages and Student C said she loved him. He sent her a message saying that he hoped she had got it clear that nothing can happen.

Thereafter he accepted that he may have suggested a meeting with her. On the Saturday – unbeknown to Student C’s mother – he drove her to a car park at the end of the Monsail Trail because “I wanted somewhere private where we wouldn’t be overheard but somewhere public to protect myself. This is where she said I wish I could do something to make you not my teacher. I gave her a friendly hug at the end. She tried to kiss me but I pulled away and said that wasn’t going to help. There may have been contact. There was definitely no inappropriate touching.” Mr Steadman’s own account of his strategy for dealing with this situation was in our view totally inappropriate and again discloses a fundamental lack of judgement. It cannot be acceptable for a teacher to arrange what was clearly a clandestine one to one meeting with one of his pupils in this way. In our view it makes no difference at all that by this date Student C was 18 as Mr Steadman being her teacher was still in a position of trust towards her. His lack of judgement is further exposed by his admission that he “gave her a friendly hug”. We therefore find this particular proved.

2. Between 17 March 2011 and 21 March 2011 Robert Frederick Steadman allowed Student C to borrow his School laptop over the weekend and disclosed his laptop password to her.

In his written statement at page 518 Mr Steadman says “Yes I did lend Student C my laptop. And yes, I realise, in retrospect, this was a silly thing to do but it was done with the best intentions.” He says he did it as she was very behind in her coursework and that at the time there were no sensitive documents on it, not, as far as he was aware, anything she shouldn’t see”. He did so as a caring teacher. He goes on to accept that he also disclosed his password to her but changed it as soon as he got the laptop back after the weekend.

These admissions reaffirm information that he provided in his investigation interview with Witness A on Wednesday 20 July 2011. Student C says that she discovered pornographic images on the Computer when she had access to it over the weekend.

Pornographic images were later discovered on Mr Steadman’s school laptop when, as a result of Student C’s disclosures, it was examined by the Local Authority IT investigation team using a software programme called Encase.

Pages:   || 2 |

Similar works:

«Podcast Transcription Session 61: SNEHAL FULZELE Welcome to the Lend Academy Podcast, Episode No. 61. This is your host, Peter Renton, Founder of Lend Academy. (music) Peter Renton: Every industry needs an ecosystem that includes companies like software providers and our industry is obviously no exception to that. Really the first and the leading software provider to the marketplace lending industry is Cloud Lending. So today I am delighted to welcome Snehal Fulzele who is the CEO and...»


«United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 10-2243, 10-2266, 10-2313, 10-2350, 11-1130 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v. DANIEL APPOLON; ERNST APPOLON; LATOYA HALTIWANGER; J. DANIEL LINDLEY; and ERIC L. LEVINE, Defendants, Appellants. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, U.S. District Judge] Before Torruella, Boudin, and Lipez, Circuit Judges. Jeanne M. Kempthorne for appellant Daniel Apollon. Mark E. Howard...»


«Vol. 37, pp. l-115,19% Pmg. Ocuvwg. Copyrisht 19%Elsetier 8 Science Lid RinkdiaGreatBritah.Allrighrs-ed PII:SOO79-6611(96)00004-3 0079 661 l/96 $3200 Early concepts and charts of ocean circulation R. G, ~SON” 9L. STRAMMA~ G. KORTTJM* and ‘Scripps Institutionof Oceanography, Universityof California-San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0230, USA %stitut fZir Meereskunde an a’er UniversitUt KieL Dtisternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel 1. Germany Abstract Charts of ocean currents from the late...»

«Zone E Residents Parking Scheme Zone E – Highfields South Explanatory notes for residents about Domestic parking permits Please read these notes before applying for a Domestic parking permit(s) and retain for future reference.These notes are about the following permits:  Residents parking permit, including free permits for blue badge holders (see page 3),  Visitors parking permits scratchcards, including free permits for people over 60 (see page 4),  Visitors parking permits...»

«FILMMAKER KERRY LAITALA WILL BE TOURING the U.K. with Films, Chromadepth Works and Expanded Cinema Works San Francisco-based Kerry Laitala is unquestionably one of the most inventive and original experimental filmmakers on the American scene today. An expert in optical printing, D.I.Y practices, such as photogram and hand processing techniques, she utilizes these processes (among others) to re-shape ‘found’ materials into 16mm & 35mm handcrafted short films that embody and celebrate the...»

«Read Online Memoirs Of Samuel Shryock Jamison Late State Senator Pennsylvania for free at Online Ebook Library. Download Now Memoirs Of Samuel Shryock Jamison Late State Senator Pennsylvania PDF file for free from our online library MEMOIRS OF SAMUEL SHRYOCK JAMISON LATE STATE SENATOR PENNSYLVANIA PDF Download: MEMOIRS OF SAMUEL SHRYOCK JAMISON LATE STATE SENATOR PENNSYLVANIA PDF MEMOIRS OF SAMUEL SHRYOCK JAMISON LATE STATE SENATOR PENNSYLVANIA PDF Are you looking for Ebook memoirs of samuel...»

«1 Louis Malle I started this essay with the assumption that Malle had been an expert, highly intelligent, committed director. Watching his work in sequence, I found that I was right – but that it took him a long time getting there, and that he kept slipping back. There’s one interesting shot in his early films. In Les Amants (1958), as Jeanne Moreau and her soon-to-be lover get near to the chateau where her husband (“the bear”), is standing with her best friend and her previous lover...»

«USDC IN/ND case 3:08-cv-00503-RL-CAN document 353 filed 11/06/15 page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION ROMAN FINNEGAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CASE NO. 3:08-CV-00503-RL-CAN ) LAUREL MYERS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF STATE DEFENDANTS’ RULE 59 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT BY REDUCING DAMAGES The jury awarded Plaintiffs in this case over $31 million dollars in compensatory damages, an award without rational...»

«ESSIE CLAY (1888-1948) Essie Clay's career on the stage encompassed both variety and serious drama between the early to mid-1890s and World War I. She first appeared on stage as a child, touring with her parents Harry and Kate Clay, and made her debut Tivoli appearance in 1898. Her career highlights were as leading lady with her father's 1909 Queensland tour (starring Scottish tragedian Walter Bentley) and a 1910 tour with the George Marlow Dramatic Co. Clay's last known stage appearances were...»

«Order Code IB89140 Issue Brief for Congress Received through the CRS Web Cyprus: Status of U.N. Negotiations Updated August 8, 2002 Carol Migdalovitz Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress CONTENTS SUMMARY MOST RECENT DEVELOPMENTS BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS Past Settlement Efforts 1977 Makarios-Denktash Meeting 1979 Kyprianou-Denktash Communique 1984 Proximity Talks 1985-86 U.N. Draft Framework Exercise 1988-89 Talks March 1990 April...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2017 www.thesis.dislib.info - Online materials, documents

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.