«56#(( 2#2'4 5'4+'5 NET FARM INCOME ESTIMATED TO DROP PRECIPITOUSLY IN 1998 by Kent Olson DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED ECONOMICS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, ...»
Staff Paper P98-6 August 1998
56#(( 2#2'4 5'4+'5
NET FARM INCOME ESTIMATED TO
DROP PRECIPITOUSLY IN 1998
DEPARTMENT OF APPLIED ECONOMICS
COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL, FOOD, AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Staff Paper P98-6 August 1998 56#(( 2#2'4 5'4+'5
NET FARM INCOME ESTIMATED TODROP PRECIPITOUSLY IN 1998 by Kent Olson Research sponsored by the Minnesota Experiment Station, Project 14-22.
The analyses and views reported in this paper are those of the authors. They are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Applied Economics or by the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation.
Information on other titles in this series may be obtained from: Waite Library, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics, 1994 Buford Avenue, 232 COB, St. Paul, MN 55108-6040, U.S.A.
NET FARM INCOME ESTIMATED TO
adjusted by the changes in price levels and changes in crop yields. The essential question is:
“What if farms produced the same crop acreage and the same number of animals and used the same production methods as they did in 1997, but received 1998 prices and yields?” This simple method of adjusting only prices and yields does not reflect the complexity of farmers’ decision making and the differences in the economic conditions between 1997 and 1998. However, in mid-August, this simple method provides an indication of the magnitude of the decline in farm income for 1998, and the need for action by farmers and others involved in agriculture.
SUMMARYFarm income in Southwestern Minnesota is estimated to drop to extremely low and possibly negative levels in 1998 due to the very low prices now in the market place. Expected Prepared by Kent Olson, Associate Professor, Department of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, August 19, 1998. His phone number is 612-625-7723; his E-mail address is firstname.lastname@example.org.
high yields on some farms will soften but not overcome the blow of the low prices; those farms with crop losses face a worse situation.
Based on the average 1997 farm income statement in the Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association and the price and yield conditions for 1998, average gross cash income in 1998 is estimated to drop 17% from 1997. Before depreciation is subtracted, net cash farm income in 1998 is predicted to be below 10% of 1997 levels: $5,367 compared to $56,469 in 1997. After accounting for depreciation and inventory changes, accrual net farm income is estimated to drop from $40,598 in 1997 to -$42,647 in 1998 -- a drop of over 200% (Table 1).
This would be the first negative average accrual net farm income in the 59 year history of the Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association.
When these losses are factored into the balance sheet, the debt/asset ratio is estimated to rise from 48% at the end of 1997 to 53% at the end of 1998 with assets valued on a market basis.
The rate of return on assets (ROA) is estimated to drop from 6.3% to -6.7%, and the rate of return on equity (ROE) is estimated to drop from 5.1% to -13.8% (Table 2). Both ROA and ROE are estimated using assets valued on a market basis.
POTENTIAL CHANGESFor many reasons, this estimate of farm income, made in mid-August will differ from the actual results recorded and calculated in January and February of 1999. Hopefully this estimate of extremely poor income will spur farmers to act and respond to opportunities to raise income and decrease expenses. The first step farmers (and all those involved in agriculture) need to take is to fight the urge to deny this potential problem. The second step is to respond as possible and needed.
The markets may move differently from what is forecast in this estimate. Local prices are reported to be near $1.60 per bushel for corn, below $5.00 for soybeans, and in the low $30s for hogs. If these prices continue for any length of time this fall, farm income will be lower than estimated. However, at these low prices most farmers will not sell grain or livestock unless forced to. Decreased cash sales will lower cash income but will not drastically alter accrual net farm income due to ending inventories being higher than if the products had been sold. Farmers are also now able to receive 1999 transition payments in 1998.
In the face of lower income, farmers will respond in several ways. First of all they will cut expenses in every way possible. With over half of the year and most of the production expenses already spent or committed, farmers do not have much room for adjustment, but they can make some adjustments. Prepaid expenses will decline, capital expenditures will decline or perhaps almost stop, nonessential repairs will not be made, family living expenses will be curtailed, etc.
Farmers will also take advantage of the government loan programs and the loan deficiency payment (LDP) programs to raise their 1998 cash receipts. A recent rule change allows farmers to receive all of their 1999 government transition payments in 1998. When possible, many farm families will also take steps to increase nonfarm income to replace the decline in farm income.
Also, some farmers will work on developing a political approach to finding help from the federal and state governments.
CALCULATION ASSUMPTIONS AND PROCEDURESThese estimates are based on the average income statement for the Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association in 1997. The price and yield conditions in 1998 are used to adapt the 1997 average as if the 1997 situation had happened in 1998. Since this is an average farm, that is, an amalgamation of many different types of farms, several assumptions and different procedures need to be made rather than just estimating changes in crop and animal production, prices, expenses, and inventories for a single farm. Although this process seems more complicated than it need be, the result is a better estimate of what farms on average may be facing in 1998 rather than estimates for a few single farms that may not reflect average conditions.
As a first step, cash farm income is adjusted based on changes in prices and, for corn and soybeans, changes in yields which determine physical amounts available for sale. For the price estimate, monthly prices for 1997 and the first 7 months for 1998 are taken from Minnesota Agricultural Statistics Service (MNASS). Prices for the remaining 5 months of 1998 are estimated based on current market trends. Simple annual averages are then used to calculate price changes for corn, soybeans, all beef, milk, and all hogs (Table 3).
Since we do not know when during the year the 208 farms in the Southwest Association sold their products (corn, for example), the estimated price change from 1997 to 1998 is used to estimate the change in the value of sales. For example, the corn price in 1998 is estimated to be 85% of the 1997 level. So if everything is constant, 1998 corn sales are expected to be 85% of the 1997 level due to prices changes alone; soybean sales, 82%; beef, 95%; and hogs, 71%. Milk, the only positive spot in these prices, is expected to have an average 1998 price that is 10% higher than the 1997 levels.
Cash crop sales for 1998 are estimated not just on price changes alone but also on changes in yield from one year to the next. In 1998, the corn yield for members in the Southwestern Association is estimated to be about 150 bushels per acre due to good growing conditions. This is higher than the 1997 average of 126 bushels and the 1996 average corn yield of 133 bushels per acre. These fluctuations certainly affect the amount of production farmers have for sale in different years. In 1998, the soybean yield is estimated to be 45 bushels per acre; in both 1997 and 1996, it was 42 bushels per acre.
If they do not feed their grain to their own livestock, farmers usually sell (in the current year) the crop produced last year, and store the current year’s crop to sell in the following year.
Thus, 1997 crop sales are most likely from crops produced in 1996. To make a yield-adjusted estimate of the 1998 crop sales, 1997 sales (of crops produced in 1996) need to be adjusted by the change in yields between 1996 and 1997. The historical yields show that the corn yield, for example, was 133 bushels per acre in 1996 and 126 bushels in 1997. Thus, for lack of a better estimate of changes in physical sales, 1998 corn sales are estimated to be 95% (126/133) of 1997 levels. The amount of soybeans for sale in 1998, compared to 1997, is estimated not to change because soybean yields were the same in 1996 and 1997.
To estimate the net effect of price and yield changes on 1998 crop sales, the 1997 average sales is multiplied by the 1998 price as a percent of 1997 price (85% for corn) and by the difference in yields between 1996 and 1997 (95% for corn). For corn, 1998 sales are estimated to be $58,480 in 1998 compared to $72,569 in 1997.
Similar physical adjustments for livestock sales are not as obvious or easy, and are not made in this estimate of 1998 income. For beef, milk, and hogs, the 1998 sales are estimated by multiplying the 1997 level by the 1998 price as a percent of 1997.
Transition payments under the 1996 FAIR are estimated not to change between 1997 and
1998. Technically, the transition payment per bushel of corn will drop from $0.46 in 1997 to $0.36, but farmers were required to pay back about $0.10 per bushel in 1997 from a 1996 payment. So the change is nullified and no change is estimated for this projection.
All other cash income is expected to decrease by 11% based on the USDA’s index of all prices received by farmers, 139 in 1997 and estimated to be 124 in 1998.
These adjustments of 1997 sales, based on price changes and yield changes, result in an estimated total gross cash farm income of $298,468 in 1998 for this average. This is a decrease of 17% from the 1997 level.
Based on the USDA’s index of prices paid by farmers in May 1998 versus May 1997, farm expenses are estimated to decline by 2%. Since sales are already estimated to be lower, cash expenses are also dropped another $5,000 to account for fewer expenses for 1999 being prepaid in 1998. This figure of $5,000 is an arbitrary number chosen to account for this expected behavior of farmers. It is approximately 21% of the ending 1997 value of prepaid expenses and supplies.
Thus, net cash farm income in 1998 is estimated to be less than 10% of the 1997 level:
$5,367 in 1998 versus $56,469 in 1997. (Depreciation has not been subtracted from this income figure.) Accrual net farm income, a more accurate estimate of the current year’s income, accounts for changes in inventory levels and for depreciation. Inventory levels of crops are adjusted from ending 1997 levels by the price change from December 1997, to the estimated price for December 1998, and by the increase in inventories due to higher yields in 1998, as noted above. The decrease in prepaid expenses is also reflected in the inventory change. Because of expected lower capital expenditures for machinery and equipment, depreciation is estimated to drop from $35,640 in 1997 to approximately $30,000 in 1998.
As a result of adjusting the 1997 sales, expenses, inventories, and depreciation, the 1998 accrual net farm income is estimated to drop precipitously from $40,598 in 1997 to -$42,647 in
1998. A negative average accrual net farm income has never occurred in the 59 year history of the Southwestern Association.
To estimate the effect of the negative accrual net farm income on the balance sheet, several adjustments need to be made. Assets and liabilities are adjusted for the net farm income loss (-$42, 647) and the additional losses due to estimated income tax payments paid in 1998 ($8,000), estimated family living ($32,000), and the estimated gain from nonfarm income ($20,000). To account for the resulting net retained earnings of -$62,647, the ending cash balance is decreased by $7,633; prepaid expenses by $5,000; crop inventories by $7,938; livestock inventories by $5,076; nonfarm assets by $2,000. In addition, current notes are increased by $33,000 and nonfarm liabilities by $2,000. To account for the decreased level of expenditures for machinery and equipment, that asset item is decreased by 10%. All other assets (including farmland values) and liabilities are left at 1997 levels.
As a result of these changes for the ending, market-valued balance sheet for 1998, the average debt/asset ratio is estimated to increase from 48% at the end of 1997 to 53% at the end of 1998. Using $25,000 for the value of operator’s labor and management and the 1997 level of interest payments ($22,282), ROA is estimated to drop from 6.3% to -4.6%. ROE is estimated to drop from 5.1% to -13.8%.
This simple method of adjusting only prices and yields does not reflect the complexity of farmers’ decision making and the differences in economic conditions between 1997 and 1998.
However, this estimate does provide an indication of the possible severity of the income change and the need for corrective actions.
Table 1. Net Farm Income estimated for 1998.
Based on all farms in the Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association
Source: MNASS, Agri-View, various issues, for 1997 and Jan-July, 1998. Aug.-Dec. 1998, are estimated.